Re: [PATCH 14/25] Fix old style notmuch-fcc-dirs configuration check.

2011-06-23 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:22:46 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:22:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:05:00 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I do not think we need a test for this fix. What we need

Re: [PATCH 14/25] Fix old style notmuch-fcc-dirs configuration check.

2011-06-23 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:58:23 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I should have prepared a better commit message from the beginning. Then no pushing might have been needed :) That, or a test case, (which would have clued me in to read the correct interpretation of

Re: [PATCH 14/25] Fix old style notmuch-fcc-dirs configuration check.

2011-06-03 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:05:00 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:49:57 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Well, it says that changes are in notmuch 0.5. So old and previous refer to pre-0.5 (i.e. 0.4) and

Re: [PATCH 14/25] Fix old style notmuch-fcc-dirs configuration check.

2011-06-03 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:22:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: notmuch was incorecctly detecting this as the ... is not right. Thanks. I was sure my commit message wasn't right yet. That was my point---I didn't know what the right message would be! ;-) It is a

Re: [PATCH 14/25] Fix old style notmuch-fcc-dirs configuration check.

2011-06-02 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
Hi Carl. On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:10:07 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:51:49 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hi Jamie, I've pushed the next few patches up to this point, (with only one functional change---I fixed a new test

Re: [PATCH 14/25] Fix old style notmuch-fcc-dirs configuration check.

2011-06-01 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:51:49 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hi Jamie, I've pushed the next few patches up to this point, (with only one functional change---I fixed a new test case to correctly use notmuch_search_sanitize to avoid spurious failures unmatching