On Mar 5, 2012 11:11 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 22:55:54 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Mar 5, 2012 5:43 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:17:43 +0100, Daniel Schoepe
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:21:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:38 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org wrote:
notmuch-saved-search-sort-function might destructively modify its
input (`sort' does that, for instance), so it should not be
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:17:43 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:21:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:38 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org
wrote:
notmuch-saved-search-sort-function might
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:17:43 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:21:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:38 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org
wrote:
notmuch-saved-search-sort-function might
On Mar 5, 2012 5:43 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:17:43 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:21:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:38 +0100, Daniel Schoepe
On Mar 5, 2012 5:43 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com
I do not buy the argument that we should help users who implement their
own sorting functions but do not read documentation for functions they
use. Apparently, those who implemented the `sort' function had similar
ideas. And
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 22:55:54 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Mar 5, 2012 5:43 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:17:43 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:21:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:38 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org wrote:
notmuch-saved-search-sort-function might destructively modify its
input (`sort' does that, for instance), so it should not be given
notmuch-saved-searches directly.
---
-1
I think we should require
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:38 +0100, Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org wrote:
notmuch-saved-search-sort-function might destructively modify its
input (`sort' does that, for instance), so it should not be given
notmuch-saved-searches directly.
Hi Daniel, thanks for fixing this. Works for me.