Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-28 Thread Pieter Praet
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:50:53 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-27 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-25 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-24 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Changes: v4: * rebased on master, no

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-24 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-24 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:33:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Also can you please send new patches (and patch series) in a new separate thread? If they are related to another thread, you can add a reference. But having multiple patch series with multiple versions in

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-24 Thread Pieter Praet
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-24 Thread Pieter Praet
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:33:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-24 Thread Pieter Praet
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:38:20 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: [...] Same here. In v2 [1], '*' tags all and 'C-u *' tags only open. One can always swap the keybindings if so inclined. Did I really say that? There's only a single keybinding, so swap it with *what* ?!? Itself ?

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-23 Thread Pieter Praet
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Changes: v4: * rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review I pushed this series. Maybe this

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations

2012-02-08 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Changes: v4: * rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review I pushed this series. Maybe this was discussed already, but I think ideally * would apply only to open messages. So