On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> sorry for the late reply, I see you already reached the same point as
> me, except with ruby ;) Yay for competition.
I think my plugin is a bit further. And yeah, competition is good, but
also collaboration; hopefully the 3 plugins can shar
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, I see you already reached the same point as
me, except with ruby ;) Yay for competition.
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:36:56 +0300, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, wrote:
>>> branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to the
>>> vim plugins dir and vim/syntax/{nm_vimpy*} to the vim
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, wrote:
>> branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to the
>> vim plugins dir and vim/syntax/{nm_vimpy*} to the vim syntax dir and run
>> :NMVimpy() in vim. You'll need vim with pyt
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, wrote:
> branch vim. Simply copy vim/plugin/{nm_vim.py,notmuch-vimpy.vim} to the
> vim plugins dir and vim/syntax/{nm_vimpy*} to the vim syntax dir and run
> :NMVimpy() in vim. You'll need vim with python support and
> python-notmuch bindings.
I gave this a try,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:34:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:34:08 +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Yes, it's still synchronous. I suppose making it asynchronous shouldn't
> > be all that hard, i just never found enough time and motivation for that
> > (it was never
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:15:07 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, an...@khirnov.net wrote:
> >
> > The advantages over current vim client are still the following:
> > * sending and displaying/saving attachments
> > * much better unicode support
> > * tag name and sea
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, an...@khirnov.net wrote:
>
> The advantages over current vim client are still the following:
> * sending and displaying/saving attachments
> * much better unicode support
> * tag name and search commands completion
> * proper representation of the thread structu
