On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:16:49 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
One option is to just drop the move_ prefix. Then everything will be
a two-word function. So the new proposal is:
to_first
has_current
to_next
to_last
has_current
to_previous
get_current
Better?
Looking
On 19:16, Mon 21 Dec 09, Carl Worth wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:23:55 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
New function Corresponds to existing function (if any)
-
move_to_first implicit
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:33:32 +0100, Ruben Pollan mes...@sindominio.net wrote:
Not sure if I understand that. Let's see if I understand well. move_to_first
(or move_to_last) will put the iterator in the first (or last) valid item.
move_to_next (and move_to_previous) will be able to reach an
With the last 4 patches there is more or less all I wanted implemented.
Do you like to call them regress? Should I change that?
What about the functions notmuch_*_is_first? Is kind of reversed logic than
notmuch_*_has_more, the last are true when is not reach the limit but the
first ones are
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:24:46 +0100, Ruben Pollan mes...@sindominio.net wrote:
Do you like to call them regress? Should I change that?
I don't love the name, (since it's so close to the word regression
which has a totally different meaning in software context). But I also
don't have an immediate
Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Wed Dec 09 13:08:43 -0700 2009:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:24:46 +0100, Ruben Pollan mes...@sindominio.net wrote:
Do you like to call them regress? Should I change that?
I don't love the name, (since it's so close to the word regression
which has a totally
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:21:04 -0700, Mark Anderson markr.ander...@amd.com wrote:
I think that changing has_more is going to be a requirement to come up with a
consistent set of names.
What? You don't want to pair it with has_less ?
-Carl
pgpPqJcgqhMLA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 12:08, Wed 09 Dec 09, Carl Worth wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:24:46 +0100, Ruben Pollan mes...@sindominio.net wrote:
Do you like to call them regress? Should I change that?
I don't love the name, (since it's so close to the word regression
which has a totally different meaning in
On 14:21, Wed 09 Dec 09, Mark Anderson wrote:
advance/retreat
Jeffrey already suggested retreat. I let you (English speakers) decide, my
English
level is not enough for it.
--
Rubén Pollán | jabber:mes...@jabber.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ésta es la historia de una
