Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:42:08 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Interesting. My only real concern at this point is that some of the new files have a copyright header identifying Junio as the copyright holder, but no license information. Meanwhile, the implicit license of git (GPLv2

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-12 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:56 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: I'm not lawyer, but I'd say it should be no problem to use GPLv2 test suite to test your GPLv3 application. You are not linking them together. Right. We could do that. But we'd have to be careful to document things

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-11 Thread Carl Worth
Hi Michal, I found myself today *really* needing to add a test that exercises some code in our emacs client. (Eric found that a message that includes a : in the From: address breaks things due to a buggy regexp.) And I wanted to see if I could merge your conversion of the test suite before I

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-08 Thread Michal Sojka
On Thursday 04 of February 2010 21:50:18 Carl Worth wrote: The test suite is still extremely rudimentary. Here are some things I'd like to improve about it: I converted the actual version of notmuch-test to git test framework. The result is in the followup patches. I'd like to know opinion of