On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:02:59 -0500, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:32:27 +0200, Arian Kuschki
arian.kusc...@googlemail.com wrote:
So one could query with sysconf and break things up into multiple
commands as needed.
Doesn't xargs do exactly this?
Almost.
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:32:27 +0200, Arian Kuschki
arian.kusc...@googlemail.com wrote:
So one could query with sysconf and break things up into multiple
commands as needed.
Doesn't xargs do exactly this?
Almost.
The arguments being passed to the notmuch tag command in this case
look like:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:43:19 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
In fact, until we have some sort of daemon that we can feed
arbitrarily-long lists to, that's what we should do.
Thinking about loud... What if the sub-commands which accept potentially
long argument lists (most of them?)
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:46:56 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:04:38 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu
wrote:
the region command only executes one notmuch tag command over
id:X or id:Y or id:Z or
...this operation is all set up to run into
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:59:01 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
We could fix all[*] the bugs of * by changing it to simply call the
new region-based tagging function. The only concern I have with that is
that it might be significantly slower, (it will execute N notmuch tag
commands to
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:04:38 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
Not quite true: the region command only executes one notmuch tag
command over id:X or id:Y or id:Z or
Sorry -- I meant, of course: over thread:X or thread:Y or thread:Z or ...
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:56:48 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson markr.ander...@amd.com
wrote:
I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we
shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:56:48 -0500, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson markr.ander...@amd.com
wrote:
I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we
shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson markr.ander...@amd.com wrote:
I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we
shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means
'tag all the threads that I can see in this buffer'.
This is
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 01:15:39 -0500, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 07:38:03 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu
wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:37:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 07:38:03 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:37:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
in a region, result of a search, ...) ?
In addition to the * command that
Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Sadly, git is not really something I know wll enough to play with
all this stuff :(
http://progit.org/book/
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
in a region, result of a search, ...) ?
notmuch tag +tag|-tag [...] [--] search-terms [...]
does this from the shell. If you want to do it from one of the user interfaces,
it depends on which
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 14:56:07 +1000, Jason White ja...@jasonjgw.net wrote:
Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
in a region, result of a search, ...) ?
notmuch tag +tag|-tag [...] [--] search-terms [...] does
this from the
14 matches
Mail list logo
