Re: [notmuch] Threading

2010-01-14 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org [2010.01.15.1108 +1300]: Reading is one thing. Information storage and organisation is another. After a message is delivered (and read) to my mailbox, it's really mine and I can (and should be able) to affix it and integrate it into my

Re: [notmuch] Threading

2009-12-15 Thread Marten Veldthuis
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:30:13 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: But I still have a hard time justifying user operations to manipulate threading. The whole point of threading is to make it faster to process and read messages. But manual operations like joining and splitting threads seem

Re: [notmuch] Threading

2009-12-10 Thread Carl Worth
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:21:34 -0700, Mark Anderson markr.ander...@amd.com wrote: I was wondering if there's a way in notmuch to group un-associated threads into a single thread. There's certainly nothing like that in notmuch currently. Sup had user-level functionality in the interface for

Re: [notmuch] Threading

2009-12-10 Thread Marten Veldthuis
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:48 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I think the right answer here is to fix the input that notmuch is getting. Just ensure that each message has a proper In-Reply-To header and all should be fine. On a related note, what about communicating with people who