Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes on februar 5, 2018 9:33:
On Mon 2018-02-05 08:33:36 +0100, Gaute Hope wrote:
Yes; this seems like the ultimate approach to this problem, unless
it will be possible for GPG to completely hide receivers - I am guessing
this is inherently impossible?
I'm not sure how
On Mon 2018-02-05 08:33:36 +0100, Gaute Hope wrote:
> Yes; this seems like the ultimate approach to this problem, unless
> it will be possible for GPG to completely hide receivers - I am guessing
> this is inherently impossible?
I'm not sure how gpg could do that -- the metadata leak of most
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes on februar 5, 2018 2:21:
On Sun 2018-02-04 16:18:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Well, i guess you could limit it to two copies total: one copy is to all
Bcc'ed recipients, and one copy to all non-Bcc'ed recipients. you'd
want to make sure that you got the same
