Re: WIP: promote nmbug to user sync tool

2022-05-29 Thread David Bremner
Sean Whitton writes: > > Either instead or in addition to something size-based, how about > requiring --force if there do not exist any tags with the prefix in the > notmuch database already? The size thing is brittle; in my scripting > attempts, I've encountered several annoying edge cases. >

Re: WIP: promote nmbug to user sync tool

2022-05-20 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat 07 May 2022 at 09:01pm -03, David Bremner wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> Just looking at my current usage, there are two cases where I've wrapped >> nmbug in some additional myrepos scripting. The first is a status >> command: >> >> status = >> nmbug-spw status |

Re: WIP: promote nmbug to user sync tool

2022-05-07 Thread David Bremner
Sean Whitton writes: > [please keep me CCed] > > Hello David, > > On Sat 23 Apr 2022 at 10:38am -03, David Bremner wrote: > > Just looking at my current usage, there are two cases where I've wrapped > nmbug in some additional myrepos scripting. The first is a status > command: > > status =

Re: WIP: promote nmbug to user sync tool

2022-04-30 Thread Sean Whitton
[please keep me CCed] Hello David, On Sat 23 Apr 2022 at 10:38am -03, David Bremner wrote: > One of the things that new (and old) users of notmuch often miss is a > way to sync tags between hosts. muchsync exists, but it's a third > party tool, and (if I understand correctly) it directly

Re: WIP: promote nmbug to user sync tool

2022-04-23 Thread David Bremner
David Bremner writes: > - the (new) man page is inadequate > - notmuch git doesn't understand the common arguments to notmuch (--config > and friends) > - the defaults for prefix and git repo are wrong for most users. I was > thinking about either a > --nmbug argument to set the old