> I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too.
>
> I suppose I should just set that up...
+1 which would make it easier to find for new users. Who would have
push rights? (not me).
Sebastian
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
htt
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:19:35 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
> > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
> > gitorious (please vote).
>
> I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too.
>
> I suppose I should
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
> gitorious (please vote).
I'd be glad to host something on notmuchmail.org too.
I suppose I should just set that up...
-Carl
pgp5KIeDjUuhO.pgp
Description: PGP signat
On 2010-10-11, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> I don't know how official this has to be -- just an agreed upon branch
> that people keep around next to their own personal one. Sebastian used
> to have one that served this purpose a while back, I think.
Well, it wasn't really semi-official or even blessed
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:10:24 +0200, Jed Brown wrote:
> Patches show up in a different order in each person's "personal, but
> 'synced'" repository. Then you need a mess of merges to actually get
> them synced (if they are published, you can't rebase).
I'd add, by way of voting for something a b
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So
>> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
>> gitorious (please vote).
>>
>> More
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:00, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> As long as all the repos are synced, then you only need to track one.
> But notmuch already has "official" repos [0], and making another
> pseudo-"official" repo will probably just makes things more confusing.
Patches show up in a different
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:40:52 +0300, Amit Kucheria
wrote:
> While distributed development is good, it would be nice for users to
> be able to clone one git repo instead of tracking 5 different trees.
> And more users typically means more robust software.
As long as all the repos are synced, then
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So
>> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
>> gitorious (please vote).
>>
>> More
> What do you think?
Good idea. github+
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On 11 October 2010 15:01, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So
>> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
>> gitorious (please vote).
>>
>> More than on
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So
> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
> gitorious (please vote).
>
> More than one person should have write access to this repo, but some
>
On 11 October 2010 14:45, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So
> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or
> gitorious (please vote).
+1 for gitorious, you can use OpenID and their code is available (for
me a si
13 matches
Mail list logo
