Re: feature request: parameters for reply templates

2020-05-15 Thread Jörg Volbers
In this particular case the implementation is probably pretty easy (still SMOP, though), just what exactly should be done is the hard part, to get nice, clean, useable and maintainable solution. Thanks for the clarification. That's of course right. JV Tomi JV Tomi Ollila writes:

Re: feature request: parameters for reply templates

2020-05-13 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Wed, May 13 2020, Jörg Volbers wrote: > OK, seems there is something I do not understand. What do you mean > with "spec in mind"? In this particular case the implementation is probably pretty easy (still SMOP, though), just what exactly should be done is the hard part, to get nice, clean,

Re: feature request: parameters for reply templates

2020-05-13 Thread Jörg Volbers
OK, seems there is something I do not understand. What do you mean with "spec in mind"? JV Tomi Ollila writes: On Tue, May 12 2020, Jörg Volbers wrote: My gut reaction is that doing more formatting in notmuch reply is probably a mistake; it's hard enough to get two users to agree on

Re: feature request: parameters for reply templates

2020-05-12 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Tue, May 12 2020, Jörg Volbers wrote: >> My gut reaction is that doing more formatting in notmuch reply >> is probably a mistake; it's hard enough to get two users to >> agree on these kind of customizations, never mind two different >> MUAs. Probably what we need to do is make sure the

Re: feature request: parameters for reply templates

2020-05-12 Thread Jörg Volbers
My gut reaction is that doing more formatting in notmuch reply is probably a mistake; it's hard enough to get two users to agree on these kind of customizations, never mind two different MUAs. Probably what we need to do is make sure the structured (json/s-expr) output has enough information

Re: feature request: parameters for reply templates

2020-05-12 Thread David Bremner
Emmanuel Beffara writes: > > I use `notmuch reply` with the default format indirectly, because I use > bower an it delegates the task of preparing replies to this command. I > feel it would make sense to define new settings to handle all this, but > maybe there are good reasons not to? > My gut

feature request: parameters for reply templates

2020-05-11 Thread Emmanuel Beffara
Hello, Unless I missed something, there is essentially no way to control how `notmuch reply` formats its template message. The standard behaviour is adequate except for a few details: - The attribution line uses a default format which is informative but overly verbose for my taste. It would be