On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:16:40 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 07:18:44AM -0500, Martin Peres wrote:
Hi,
I am working on power management on the nouveau driver and I need a way
to get data out of
Dave,
The answers are inlined.
Le 03/03/2011 10:36, Dave Airlie a écrit :
Martin,
you probably should have cc'ed Matthew since it was his patch you based this on,
and I think he can provide a good explaination.
I knew he was monitoring the nouveau ML. He provided a good explanation
but
Le 03/03/2011 16:22, Guenter Roeck a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:36:09AM -0500, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jean Delvarekh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:16:40 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 07:18:44AM -0500, Martin Peres
So these faults are just generic errors? Unrelated to page faults?
These faults *are* page faults, in a way.
On nv50, page faults are quite weird. When a fault happens, the MMU's fault
reporting registers at 0x100c90 are filled with fault information, and the
'fault pending' flag is set. This
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:36:09AM -0500, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:16:40 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 07:18:44AM -0500, Martin Peres wrote:
Hi,
I am working on power
Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 18:29 +0100 schrieb Martin Peres:
Le 03/03/2011 16:22, Guenter Roeck a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:36:09AM -0500, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jean Delvarekh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:16:40 -0800, Guenter
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31676
--- Comment #13 from Armando Di Cianno arma...@goodship.net 2011-03-03
13:14:12 PST ---
I can confirm this bug, and especially comment #10 - I have exactly the same
distortion in BIOS mode (not worrying about EFI here at the moment. As
expected,
Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 13:19 -0800 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:48 -0500, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 18:29 +0100 schrieb Martin Peres:
Le 03/03/2011 16:22, Guenter Roeck a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:36:09AM -0500, Dave Airlie
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 16:56 -0500, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 13:19 -0800 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:48 -0500, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 18:29 +0100 schrieb Martin Peres:
Le 03/03/2011 16:22, Guenter Roeck a écrit :
Le 03/03/2011 23:03, Guenter Roeck a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 16:56 -0500, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 13:19 -0800 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:48 -0500, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 18:29 +0100 schrieb Martin Peres:
Le
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 06:53:12PM -0500, Martin Peres wrote:
[ ... ]
Guenter
This is a bigger change than we initially aimed for and I didn't dare to
ask for such a heavy modification, but I'm very happy with this solution
if you prefer and support it this way.
If done right, it should
11 matches
Mail list logo
