Re: [Nouveau] enable ctxprog xfer only when we need it to save power introduces big performance regression

2011-12-28 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:10:44AM +0100, Martin Peres wrote: Le 09/11/2011 23:10, Marcin Slusarz a écrit : For anyone who don't read IRC logs - it turns out it regressed only on my box, because I have page flipping disabled (due to page flipping being very buggy here, see

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: move definition of nouveau_grctx to separate file

2011-12-28 Thread Marcin Slusarz
Avoids conditional definition of grctx build functions, which is hard for IDE's to handle properly. Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz marcin.slus...@gmail.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_grctx.h | 21 ++--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_grctx_def.h | 21

Re: [Nouveau] enable ctxprog xfer only when we need it to save power introduces big performance regression

2011-12-28 Thread Martin Peres
On 28/12/2011 22:39, Marcin Slusarz wrote: Heh, with page flipping enabled, regression is still there, only smaller (61-54, instead of 49 FPS). I want my Nouveau performance back ;) --- From: Marcin Slusarzmarcin.slus...@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH] drm/nv50/gr: make xfers only in ctxprog

Re: [Nouveau] enable ctxprog xfer only when we need it to save power introduces big performance regression

2011-12-28 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:58:35AM +0100, Martin Peres wrote: On 28/12/2011 22:39, Marcin Slusarz wrote: Heh, with page flipping enabled, regression is still there, only smaller (61-54, instead of 49 FPS). I want my Nouveau performance back ;) --- From: Marcin