Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 4/4] nvfx: random cleanups of the state validation code

2012-01-17 Thread Patrice Mandin
Le Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:41:04 +0100 Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de a écrit: Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de --- src/gallium/drivers/nvfx/nvfx_state_emit.c | 49 --- 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 4/4] nvfx: random cleanups of the state validation code

2012-01-17 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2012, 18:22 +0100 schrieb Patrice Mandin: Le Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:41:04 +0100 Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de a écrit: Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de --- src/gallium/drivers/nvfx/nvfx_state_emit.c | 49 --- 1 files changed, 22

Re: [Nouveau] enable ctxprog xfer only when we need it to save power introduces big performance regression

2012-01-17 Thread Martin Peres
Le 17/01/2012 21:55, Lucas Stach a écrit : Isn't it possible that the performance regression seen with xfer disabled by default is caused by slow memory clock speed? Martin, you saw only a 1% performance drop on your 8600 which is running with full speed by default. Marcins nv92 is likely