[Nouveau] Nouveau failing during probe followed by GPF on 3.13-rc2

2013-12-04 Thread Bruno Prémont
Hi, With 3.13-rc1 and 3.13-rc2 kernel crashes/BUGs while loading nouveau: [ 657.654915] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IXVE.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20131115/nsarguments-95) [ 657.655099] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IXVE.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4

Re: [Nouveau] Nouveau failing during probe followed by GPF on 3.13-rc2

2013-12-04 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Bruno Prémont bonb...@linux-vserver.org wrote: Hi, With 3.13-rc1 and 3.13-rc2 kernel crashes/BUGs while loading nouveau: [ 657.654915] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IXVE.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package]

Re: [Nouveau] Nouveau failing during probe followed by GPF on 3.13-rc2

2013-12-04 Thread Bruno Prémont
Hi Ilia, On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 06:15:30 -0500 Ilia Mirkin wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Bruno Prémont wrote: With 3.13-rc1 and 3.13-rc2 kernel crashes/BUGs while loading nouveau: [ 657.654915] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IXVE.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer],

[Nouveau] [Bug 72315] New: Fedora 19 64-bit X crash

2013-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72315 Priority: medium Bug ID: 72315 Assignee: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Fedora 19 64-bit X crash QA Contact: xorg-t...@lists.x.org Severity: major Classification:

[Nouveau] [Bug 72315] Fedora 19 64-bit X crash

2013-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72315 --- Comment #1 from Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu --- Do things work well otherwise? Might this card be a NVC1? If so, get 3.11.10+, 3.12.2+ or 3.13-rc1+, there's a commit that fixes semi-random failures in there for NVC1. Take a look at

Re: [Nouveau] Nouveau failing during probe followed by GPF on 3.13-rc2

2013-12-04 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Bruno Prémont bonb...@linux-vserver.org wrote: [ 657.800140] nouveau E[ DRM] failed to create 0x8080, -22 [ 657.802123] general protection fault: [#1] SMP [ 657.802130]

[Nouveau] [Bug 70388] [NV34] failed to idle channel 0xcccc0000

2013-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70388 --- Comment #16 from Rostislav Krasny rosti@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #15) Please take a look at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69375#c7 and see if doing that helps. I see that, at the very least, your kernel was

[Nouveau] [Bug 70388] [NV34] failed to idle channel 0xcccc0000

2013-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70388 --- Comment #17 from Rostislav Krasny rosti@gmail.com --- ...and /var/log/kdm.log has the similar backtraces like it was in a past: (EE) Backtrace: (EE) 0: /usr/bin/X (mieqEnqueue+0x21b) [0x81d4adb] (EE) 1: /usr/bin/X

[Nouveau] [Bug 64323] Severe misrendering in Left 4 Dead 2

2013-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64323 --- Comment #28 from anakin...@gmail.com --- There's now a commit with the older patch which does the wait and reduce FPS: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=0e5bf8565106833e1a678ebdae81fdf1657391c9 Shouldn't we have the latest one

[Nouveau] [Bug 64323] Severe misrendering in Left 4 Dead 2

2013-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64323 --- Comment #29 from Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu --- The wait is correct and always needed. I believe that the last patch is actually incorrect. I've added a whole bunch of comments to that function which reflect my understanding of how it