Hello everyone
I'm a 2nd year Computer Science student in India.
I'm proficient in C++, Data Structures and Algorithms, Linux and git.
I've been using Linux for about 2 years now and shifted to Arch Linux with
i3wm a year ago.
I wish to get involved in nouveau driver development.
Any kind of
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:51PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in tegra.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
> ---
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 5:29 PM Ralph Campbell wrote:
>
>
> On 9/15/20 10:36 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:39:47AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> >>> I don't think any of the three ->page_free instances even cares about
> >>> the page refcount.
> >>>
> >> Not true.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:44PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in mediatek. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap,
> which is
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in exynos. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap,
> which is
Hi
Am 16.09.20 um 12:03 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
>> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
>> per-instance callbacks in exynos.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 04:10:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> You also need to fix up ext4_break_layouts() and
> xfs_break_dax_layouts() to expect ->_refcount is 0 instead of 1. This
> also needs some fstests exposure.
While we're at it, can we add a wait_fsdax_unref helper macro that hides
the
Hi Thomas,
On 09/15, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in vgem. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap,
> which is non-trivial to convert.
>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:40PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in etnaviv. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap,
> which is
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:45PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in msm. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap,
> which is
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:42PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in gma500.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Reviewed-by:
Hi Thomas,
On 09/15, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in vkms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Thanks! Looks fine.
Reviewed-by:
Hi
Am 15.09.20 um 17:25 schrieb Christian König:
> Added my rb to the amdgpu and radeon patches.
>
> Should we pick those up through the amd branches or do you want to push
> everything to drm-misc-next?
>
> I think the later since this should result in much merge clash.
Yes, preferable, I'd
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:06:39PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> fallthrough to a separate case/default label break; isn't very readable.
>
> Convert pseudo-keyword fallthrough; statements to a simple break; when
> the next label is case or default and the only statement in the next
> label block
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:36:28PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 16.09.20 um 12:03 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> >> struct drm_driver. This
Am 15.09.20 um 16:59 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Several GEM and PRIME callbacks have been deprecated in favor of
> per-instance GEM object functions. Remove the callbacks as they are
> now unused. The only exception is .gem_prime_mmap, which is still
> in use by several drivers.
>
> What is
On 9/15/20 10:36 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:39:47AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
I don't think any of the three ->page_free instances even cares about
the page refcount.
Not true. The page_free() callback records the page is free by setting
a bit or putting the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces virtgpu's per-driver PRIME export
> function with a per-object function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:58PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Several GEM and PRIME callbacks have been deprecated in favor of
> per-instance GEM object functions. Remove the callbacks as they are
> now unused. The only exception is .gem_prime_mmap, which is still
> in use by several
On 9/9/2020 1:55 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:06:39PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c
>> index eea0f453cfb6..8aac5bc60f4c 100644
>> --- a/crypto/tcrypt.c
>> +++ b/crypto/tcrypt.c
>> @@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static int do_test(const
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:50PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in rockchip. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap,
> which is
Hi
Am 15.09.20 um 17:05 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 15.09.20 um 16:59 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
>> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
>> per-instance callbacks in amdgpu. The only
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:46PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
> per-instance callbacks in nouveau.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Hm ttm and
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 517751310dd2..5a82037a4b26 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1093,34 +1093,6 @@ static inline bool is_zone_device_page(const struct
> page *page)
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS
> void
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:24:50PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This adds support for querying the maximum clock rate of a downstream
> port on a DisplayPort connection. Generally, downstream ports refer to
> active dongles which can have their own pixel clock limits.
>
> Note as well, we also
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:34:24PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> With the nitpicks addressed (note there were a couple of other spots where we
> wanted to use Return: in the kdocs, but I didn't bother pointing all of them
> out), all but patch 07 is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
Thanks for the
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:11 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:03:22PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:01 PM Karol Herbst wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The temp_get() function currently
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:03:22PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:01 PM Karol Herbst wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > >
> > > The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a
> > > temperature. However, the
Ben, did you have a chance to look at this?
-Daniel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:22 PM Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
>
> Op 02-08-2020 om 20:18 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > Purely conjecture, but I think the original locking inversion with the
> > legacy page flip code between flipping and ttm's bo move
29 matches
Mail list logo
