On 9/13/23 17:33, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.09.23 um 17:15 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
On 9/13/23 16:26, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.09.23 um 14:16 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
As mentioned in a different mail thread, the reply is based on the assumption
that we don't support anything else
Am 13.09.23 um 17:15 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
On 9/13/23 16:26, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.09.23 um 14:16 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
As mentioned in a different mail thread, the reply is based on the
assumption
that we don't support anything else than GPUVM updates from the IOCTL.
I think
Am 13.09.23 um 17:13 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
Hi Christian
On 9/13/23 16:26, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.09.23 um 14:16 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
As mentioned in a different mail thread, the reply is based on the
assumption
that we don't support anything else than GPUVM updates from the
Hi Christian
On 9/13/23 16:26, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.09.23 um 14:16 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
As mentioned in a different mail thread, the reply is based on the
assumption
that we don't support anything else than GPUVM updates from the IOCTL.
I think that this assumption is
On 9/13/23 16:26, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.09.23 um 14:16 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
As mentioned in a different mail thread, the reply is based on the assumption
that we don't support anything else than GPUVM updates from the IOCTL.
I think that this assumption is incorrect.
Well, more
On 9/13/23 16:01, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:22:56 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 9/13/23 13:33, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:39:01 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi,
On 9/13/23 09:19, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 17:05:42 +1000
Am 13.09.23 um 14:16 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
As mentioned in a different mail thread, the reply is based on the assumption
that we don't support anything else than GPUVM updates from the IOCTL.
I think that this assumption is incorrect.
Vulkan is just once specific use case, but this here
On 9/13/23 13:33, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:39:01 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi,
On 9/13/23 09:19, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 17:05:42 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 17:03, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:20:32
As mentioned in a different mail thread, the reply is based on the assumption
that we don't support anything else than GPUVM updates from the IOCTL.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:14:46AM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 01:36 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On Tue,
After some more discussion with Boris on IRC, he seems to be willing to drop
GPUVM
updates from the async path. If everyone agrees I'm fine to go ahead and drop
this
use case for GPUVM.
@Thomas: I will reply to your last mail only considering GPUVM updates from
within
the IOCTL.
- Danilo
On
Hi,
On 9/13/23 09:19, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 17:05:42 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 17:03, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:20:32 +0200
Thomas Hellström wrote:
+/**
+ * get_next_vm_bo_from_list() - get the next vm_bo element
+ *
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 01:36 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:23:08PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> > On 9/12/23 18:50, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 06:20:32PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > > > Hi, Danilo,
> > > >
> > > > On
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 17:03, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:20:32 +0200
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
> > > +/**
> > > + * get_next_vm_bo_from_list() - get the next vm_bo element
> > > + * @__gpuvm: The GPU VM
> > > + * @__list_name: The name of the list we're iterating on
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
