On 11/28/23 19:01, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
On 11/16/23 20:55, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 20:45 +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
As I already mentioned for Timur's patch [2], I'd prefer to get a fix
upstream
(meaning [1] in this case). Of course, that's probably more up to Timur
bounds of 'PACKED_REGISTRY_ENTRY[0]'
[-Warray-bounds=]
While there, also make use of the struct_size() helper, and address
checkpatch.pl warning:
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
This results in no differences in binary output.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
.../nvrm
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks
--
Gustavo
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/pm/priv.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau
: Daniel Vetter
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: virtualizat...@lists.linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks
--
Gustavo
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks
--
Gustavo
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm
Cc: "Pan, Xinhui"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Xiaojian Du
Cc: Huang Rui
Cc: Kevin Wang
Cc: amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks
--
Gustavo
---
drivers/gpu/drm/am
...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks
--
Gustavo
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
index bf66499765fb
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Bjorn Andersson
Cc: linux-arm-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: freedr...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks
--
Gustavo
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Hawking Zhang
Cc: amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks
--
Gustavo
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Chris Wilson
Cc: John Harrison
Cc: Andi Shyti
Cc: Matthew Brost
Cc: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks
--
Gustavo
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests
Fix checkpatch.pl ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index
One-element and zero-length arrays are deprecated. So, replace
one-element array in struct nouveau_svm with flexible-array member.
This results in no differences in binary output.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/338
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau
This small series aims to replace a one-element array with a
flexible-array member in struct nouveau_svm. And, while at it,
fix a checkpatch.pl error.
Gustavo A. R. Silva (2):
nouveau/svm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member in
struct nouveau_svm
nouveau/svm: Split
],
|
~~~^~
Fixes: 813443721331 ("drm/nouveau/disp: move DP link config into acquire")
Cc: Ben Skeggs
Cc: Lyude Paul
Cc: Karol Herbst
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Dave Airlie
Cc: "Gustavo A
/issues/78
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvfw/hs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvfw/hs.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvfw/hs.h
index 8c4cd08a7b5f..8b58b668fc0c 100644
ude Paul
> Cc: David Airlie
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Cc: Gourav Samaiya
> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
> Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Here is my RB again:
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
T
ude Paul
> Cc: David Airlie
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Cc: Gourav Samaiya
> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
> Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks!
--
Gustavo
>
off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
Hi all,
I'm expecting to carry this patch in my tree, so it'd be great to
get some Acks. And given the size of the patch, I'm only sending
this to mailing lists.
Thanks!
arch/alpha/include/asm/hwrpb.h| 2 +-
arch/ia64/include/asm/sa
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:17:40AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:47:43AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
> > having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
> &g
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:19:29PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:21:10PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:17:40AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:47:43AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:05:47PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:24 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> wrote:
>
> Can you also send the ACPI patch separately, please?
>
> We would like to route it through the upstream ACPICA code base.
Yeah; no problem.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version,
in order to avoid any potential type mistakes or integer overflows that,
in the worse scenario, could lead to heap overflows.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu
that kvcalloc checks whether the multiplication overflows and
> > returns NULL in this case?
>
> That's correct. :)
>
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:21 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Use 2-factor argument form kvcalloc() instead of kvza
Use 2-factor argument form kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc().
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
b
Hi all,
If you don't mind, I'm taking this in my -next[1] branch for v5.14.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp
On 6/1/21 17:57, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly second ping: who can take thi
ers?
No other person has replied after pinging multiple times and resending
these patches, so I guess people don't care.
I'll add this and the other similar patches to my -next branch for 5.14.
Thanks, Karol.
--
Gustavo
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 1:16 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> wrote:
&
Hi all,
If you don't mind, I'm taking this in my -next[1] branch for v5.14.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp
On 6/1/21 17:58, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly second ping: who can take thi
A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 3/5/21 03:58, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
>> by explicitly adding a brea
A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 3/5/21 03:56, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
>> by explicitly adding a brea
A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 3/5/21 03:56, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a couple
>> of warnings by explicitly addi
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:58, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:56, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a couple
> of warnings by explicitly adding a couple of break statements instead
> of letting the code fal
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:56, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a couple
of warnings by explicitly adding a couple of break statements instead
of letting the code fall through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:52:27AM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Gustavo,
>
> > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in
> > order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.
>
> Applied 20-22,54,120-124 to 5.11/scsi-staging, thanks.
Awesome! :)
Thanks,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:03:45PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:21:39PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
> > IB/hfi1: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
> > IB/mlx4: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
> > IB/qedr: Fix fall-th
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 08:38:46PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in
> > order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.
> >
> > In prepa
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:53:55AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 11:22 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 11:12 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 10:21 -0800, James
On 11/20/20 12:28, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 12:21 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in
>> order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.
>>
>> In prepa
cc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91432
[4] https://godbolt.org/z/xgkvIh
[5] commit a035d552a93b ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning")
[6] commit 4169e889e588 ("include: jhash/signal: Fix fall-through warnings for
Clang")
Thanks!
Gustavo A. R. Silva (141):
Hi,
On 11/20/20 12:53, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in
>> order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.
>>
>> In preparation to en
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a couple
of warnings by explicitly adding a couple of break statements instead
of letting the code fall through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm
eak;
>
> Found using:
>
> $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n
> "fallthrough;(\s*(case\s+\w+|default)\s*:\s*){1,7}break;" *
>
> Miscellanea:
>
> o Move or coalesce a couple label blocks above a default: block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe P
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 01:22:35PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 03:31, Gustavo A. R. Silva
> wrote:
> >
> > Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
> > the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unne
-fall-through
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c|2 -
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c |2 -
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c|4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/hdmi.c| 34
igned-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/mmu.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/mmu.c
index ae08a1ca8044..5641bda2046d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/mmu.c
+++ b/driver
, data, mmu->kind_nr)
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/mmu.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/mm
Hi all,
Alex Deucher requested me to send separate patches for each
driver, which makes this patch available to be taken,
again.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 2/15/19 10:02 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please drop this, as I have included this fix into
> the following patch, whi
On 2/15/19 10:11 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:08 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> wrote:
>>
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -
Hi,
Please drop this, as I have included this fix into
the following patch, which addresses all the
expected fall-throughs in drivers/gpu/drm:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1042856/
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 2/11/19 12:58 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabl
of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/bios/bios_parser2.c | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd
Hello,
Friendly ping (second one):
Who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 1/10/19 1:33 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly ping:
>
> Who can take this?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 10/17/18 9:28 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wro
orm) {
^~
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c:217:2: note: here
case NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_FB_SIZE:
^~~~
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insert
Ben,
I wonder if you can take this too:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1001180/
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 1/29/19 8:51 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> Got it, thanks.
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 06:55, Gustavo A. R. Silva
> wrote:
>>
>> In preparation to enabling -Wim
Fix this by adding
> in the missing break.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460507 ("Missing break in switch")
>
> Fixes: 359088d5b8ec ("drm/nouveau: remove trivial cases of nvxx_device()
> usage")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
Reviewed-by: Gusta
On 1/29/19 2:49 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>
> On 10/8/18 3:47 PM, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> The NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_PCI_DEVICE case is missing a break statement and falls
>> through to the following NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_BUS_TYPE ca
: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm
Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can take this?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 10/17/18 9:28 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch aims to suppress 29 missing-break-in-switch false positives
ot;)
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141435 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141436 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/hdmi.c| 17 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c
Hi all,
Friendly ping! Who can take this?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 07/24/2018 08:27 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In case memory resources for *bl_desc* were allocated, release
> them before return.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1472021 ("Resource leak")
> Fixes: 0d4669015
In case memory resources for *bl_desc* were allocated, release
them before return.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1472021 ("Resource leak")
Fixes: 0d466901552a ("drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/se
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/hdmi.c| 17 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu
the kernel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Use sizeof(buf) instead of NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE. This change
is based on the feedback provided by David Laight. Thanks David.
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/
Hi David,
On 03/13/2018 11:10 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Sent: 13 March 2018 14:48
In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular
case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local
variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size
the kernel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/ls_ucode_msgqueue.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/s
Hi all,
While doing some static analysis I ran into the following piece of
code at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmm.c:957:
957#define node(root, dir) ((root)->head.dir == >list) ? NULL :
\
958list_entry((root)->head.dir, struct nvkm_vma, head)
959
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1260018
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1260019
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1260022
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouvea
-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/devinit/nv04.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/devinit/nv04.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/devinit/nv04.c
Add null check before dereferencing pointer asyc
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1397932
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_displa
73 matches
Mail list logo
