On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Karol Herbst wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> but with a better name for "denominator".
>>
>> I don't know what M and P actually are in this function, so I couldn't
>> come up with a much
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Karol Herbst wrote:
>>> In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive
>>> than '&&', so I'm adding a comparison to zero instead to shut up
>>> the
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Karol Herbst wrote:
>> In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive
>> than '&&', so I'm adding a comparison to zero instead to shut up
>> the warning. To further improve readability, I also make the
>> error case indented
gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool
is confusing:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean
context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
In this