on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 16:59:28 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 at 08:39, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> >
> > The bug is here:
> > return encoder;
> >
> > The list iterator value 'encoder' will *always* be set and non-NULL
> > by drm_for_each_encoder_mask(), so it is incorrect to
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 03:09, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
>
> on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 16:59:28 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 at 08:39, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > >
> > > The bug is here:
> > > return encoder;
> > >
> > > The list iterator value 'encoder' will *always* be set and
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
Will push this to the appropriate repository shortly.
On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 15:39 +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> The bug is here:
> return encoder;
>
> The list iterator value 'encoder' will *always* be set and non-NULL
> by drm_for_each_encoder_mask(), so it is
On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 at 08:39, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
>
> The bug is here:
> return encoder;
>
> The list iterator value 'encoder' will *always* be set and non-NULL
> by drm_for_each_encoder_mask(), so it is incorrect to assume that the
> iterator value will be NULL if the list is empty or
The bug is here:
return encoder;
The list iterator value 'encoder' will *always* be set and non-NULL
by drm_for_each_encoder_mask(), so it is incorrect to assume that the
iterator value will be NULL if the list is empty or no element found.
Otherwise it will bypass some NULL checks and
