On 8/31/20 11:02 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:21:41AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
On 8/31/20 4:51 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
The user level OpenCL code shouldn't have to align start and end
addresses
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:21:41AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>
> On 8/31/20 4:51 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> > > The user level OpenCL code shouldn't have to align start and end
> > > addresses to a page boundary. That is
On 8/31/20 4:51 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
The user level OpenCL code shouldn't have to align start and end
addresses to a page boundary. That is better handled in the nouveau
driver. The npages field is also redundant since it
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> The user level OpenCL code shouldn't have to align start and end
> addresses to a page boundary. That is better handled in the nouveau
> driver. The npages field is also redundant since it can be computed
> from the start and end
The user level OpenCL code shouldn't have to align start and end
addresses to a page boundary. That is better handled in the nouveau
driver. The npages field is also redundant since it can be computed
from the start and end addresses.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell
---
This is for Ben Skegg's
