Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-29 Thread Martin Peres
Le 29/04/2011 02:56, Nigel Cunningham a écrit : Hi. On 29/04/11 04:35, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 20:29, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:24 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 18:58, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : Interesting fact is that GPU temperatures rise to

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-29 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. On 29/04/11 16:54, Martin Peres wrote: Le 29/04/2011 02:56, Nigel Cunningham a écrit : Hi. On 29/04/11 04:35, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 20:29, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:24 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 18:58, Maxim Levitsky a écrit :

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 01:58 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Hi everyone, I would like everyone to test this set of patch as we'll need them quite soon for timing management on nv50. Please report success/failure by answering to this email. Thanks in advance, Martin I tested this. Patch

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Peres
Le 28/04/2011 12:32, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 01:58 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Hi everyone, I would like everyone to test this set of patch as we'll need them quite soon for timing management on nv50. Please report success/failure by answering to this email. Thanks in

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:15 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 12:32, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 01:58 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Hi everyone, I would like everyone to test this set of patch as we'll need them quite soon for timing management on nv50.

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Peres
Le 28/04/2011 13:43, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : Martin, one more thing, this is my observations regarding clocks I finished today: clock = (ref * N / M) (P 0x7) first line is blob, second nouveau level0: P NNMM 0x4008 - memory - 0018e200 2505 = 1

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:11 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 13:43, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : Martin, one more thing, this is my observations regarding clocks I finished today: clock = (ref * N / M) (P 0x7) first line is blob, second nouveau level0:

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Peres
Le 28/04/2011 14:32, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:11 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Good work Maxim! Can you please tell us what card you use? For what range of card is this true? I can give you access to the vbios repo so as you can contact some people for further testing if

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:35 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 14:32, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:11 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Good work Maxim! Can you please tell us what card you use? For what range of card is this true? I can give you access to the vbios

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:43:31 +0100, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, one more thing, this is my observations regarding clocks I finished today: clock = (ref * N / M) (P 0x7) first line is blob, second nouveau level0: P NNMM 0x4008

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 16:24 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:43:31 +0100, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, one more thing, this is my observations regarding clocks I finished today: clock = (ref * N / M) (P 0x7) first line is blob, second

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Peres
Le 28/04/2011 18:58, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : Interesting fact is that GPU temperatures rise to very high levels (~75C) even while doing CPU only work (like compiling kernel for example). Let me guess, you're on a laptop? The temperature of the case goes up when the processor is working and so,

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:24 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 18:58, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : Interesting fact is that GPU temperatures rise to very high levels (~75C) even while doing CPU only work (like compiling kernel for example). Let me guess, you're on a laptop? The

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Martin Peres
Le 28/04/2011 20:29, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:24 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 18:58, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : Interesting fact is that GPU temperatures rise to very high levels (~75C) even while doing CPU only work (like compiling kernel for example). Let

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/2] reclocking stability improvements

2011-04-28 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. On 29/04/11 04:35, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 20:29, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:24 +0200, Martin Peres wrote: Le 28/04/2011 18:58, Maxim Levitsky a écrit : Interesting fact is that GPU temperatures rise to very high levels (~75C) even while doing CPU only