On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 1:17 PM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Currently, NO_PREFETCH is passed implicitly through
> drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf_push::length and drm_nouveau_exec_push::va_len.
>
> Since this is a direct representation of how the HW is programmed it
> isn't really future proof for a uAPI.
Currently, NO_PREFETCH is passed implicitly through
drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf_push::length and drm_nouveau_exec_push::va_len.
Since this is a direct representation of how the HW is programmed it
isn't really future proof for a uAPI. Hence, fix this up for the new
uAPI and split up the va_len field
