Re: [Nouveau] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_cursor_crc: Test 32x32 cursors

2021-03-18 Thread Lyude Paul
On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 14:39 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:39:01AM +0200, Martin Peres wrote: > > On 18/03/2021 00:45, Lyude wrote: > > > From: Lyude Paul > > > > > > Since pre-nve4 only has two cursor sizes (32x32 and 64x64), we should at > > > least test both of them.

Re: [Nouveau] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_cursor_crc: Test 32x32 cursors

2021-03-18 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:39:01AM +0200, Martin Peres wrote: > On 18/03/2021 00:45, Lyude wrote: > > From: Lyude Paul > > > > Since pre-nve4 only has two cursor sizes (32x32 and 64x64), we should at > > least test both of them. > > This adds 36 subtests, which take about 1s in average. So the

Re: [Nouveau] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_cursor_crc: Test 32x32 cursors

2021-03-18 Thread Petri Latvala
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:39:01AM +0200, Martin Peres wrote: > On 18/03/2021 00:45, Lyude wrote: > > From: Lyude Paul > > > > Since pre-nve4 only has two cursor sizes (32x32 and 64x64), we should at > > least test both of them. > > This adds 36 subtests, which take about 1s in average. So the

Re: [Nouveau] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_cursor_crc: Test 32x32 cursors

2021-03-18 Thread Martin Peres
On 18/03/2021 00:45, Lyude wrote: From: Lyude Paul Since pre-nve4 only has two cursor sizes (32x32 and 64x64), we should at least test both of them. This adds 36 subtests, which take about 1s in average. So the runtime is not significantly increased on the Intel side. It also seems that