On 07.07.2015 23:05, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 06:06, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Ben,
Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly
in the nouveau DDX. Mainly it's missing DRI2, which in turn means no
core GL contexts, and probably lots of other
Ben,
Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly
in the nouveau DDX. Mainly it's missing DRI2, which in turn means no
core GL contexts, and probably lots of other issues. While this could
probably be fixed somehow, I doubt there's any advantage to using the
nouveau DDX
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Ben Skeggs skeg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 06:06, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Ben,
Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly
in the nouveau DDX. Mainly it's missing DRI2, which in turn means no
core GL
On 8 July 2015 at 07:09, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Ben Skeggs skeg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 06:06, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Ben,
Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly
in the nouveau DDX.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Ben Skeggs skeg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 07:09, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Ben Skeggs skeg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 06:06, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Ben,
Looks like the
On 8 July 2015 at 06:06, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Ben,
Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly
in the nouveau DDX. Mainly it's missing DRI2, which in turn means no
core GL contexts, and probably lots of other issues. While this could
probably be
