Am 11.06.21 um 20:23 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
On Friday 11 June 2021 14:38:18 Christian König wrote:
Am 10.06.21 um 19:59 schrieb Christian König:
Am 10.06.21 um 19:50 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
[SNIP]
I can't see how this is called from the nouveau code, only
possibility I
see is that it is maybe
On Friday 11 June 2021 14:38:18 Christian König wrote:
>
> Am 10.06.21 um 19:59 schrieb Christian König:
> > Am 10.06.21 um 19:50 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
> >> [SNIP]
> >>> I can't see how this is called from the nouveau code, only
> >>> possibility I
> >>> see is that it is maybe called through the
Am 10.06.21 um 19:59 schrieb Christian König:
Am 10.06.21 um 19:50 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
[SNIP]
I can't see how this is called from the nouveau code, only
possibility I
see is that it is maybe called through the AGP code somehow.
Yes, you're right:
[ 13.192663] Call Trace:
[ 13.192678]
Am 10.06.21 um 19:50 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
On Thursday 10 June 2021 08:43:06 Christian König wrote:
Am 09.06.21 um 22:00 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
On Wednesday 09 June 2021 11:21:05 Christian König wrote:
Am 09.06.21 um 09:10 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
On Wednesday 09 June 2021, Christian König wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2021 08:43:06 Christian König wrote:
>
> Am 09.06.21 um 22:00 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
> > On Wednesday 09 June 2021 11:21:05 Christian König wrote:
> >> Am 09.06.21 um 09:10 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
> >>> On Wednesday 09 June 2021, Christian König wrote:
> Am 09.06.21 um 08:57
Am 09.06.21 um 22:00 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
On Wednesday 09 June 2021 11:21:05 Christian König wrote:
Am 09.06.21 um 09:10 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
On Wednesday 09 June 2021, Christian König wrote:
Am 09.06.21 um 08:57 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
[SNIP]
Thanks for the heads up. So the problem with my
On Wednesday 09 June 2021 11:21:05 Christian König wrote:
> Am 09.06.21 um 09:10 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
> > On Wednesday 09 June 2021, Christian König wrote:
> >> Am 09.06.21 um 08:57 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
> >>> [SNIP]
> Thanks for the heads up. So the problem with my patch is already fixed,
>
Am 09.06.21 um 09:10 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
On Wednesday 09 June 2021, Christian König wrote:
Am 09.06.21 um 08:57 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
[SNIP]
Thanks for the heads up. So the problem with my patch is already fixed,
isn't it?
The NULL pointer dereference in nouveau_bo_wr16 introduced in
Am 09.06.21 um 08:57 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
[SNIP]
Thanks for the heads up. So the problem with my patch is already fixed,
isn't it?
The NULL pointer dereference in nouveau_bo_wr16 introduced in
141b15e59175aa174ca1f7596188bd15a7ca17ba was fixed by
aea656b0d05ec5b8ed5beb2f94c4dd42ea834e9d.
Am 08.06.21 um 23:59 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
On Tuesday 08 June 2021 22:01:56 Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Tuesday 08 June 2021 20:47:42 Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2021 22:58:43 Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Sunday 06 June 2021 23:16:03 Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Saturday 05 June 2021 23:34:23 Ondrej
On Wednesday 09 June 2021, Christian König wrote:
> Am 09.06.21 um 08:57 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
> > [SNIP]
> >> Thanks for the heads up. So the problem with my patch is already fixed,
> >> isn't it?
> > The NULL pointer dereference in nouveau_bo_wr16 introduced in
> >
On Wednesday 09 June 2021, Christian König wrote:
> Am 08.06.21 um 23:59 schrieb Ondrej Zary:
> > On Tuesday 08 June 2021 22:01:56 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 08 June 2021 20:47:42 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> >>> On Monday 07 June 2021 22:58:43 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Sunday 06 June 2021
On Tuesday 08 June 2021 22:01:56 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 June 2021 20:47:42 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Monday 07 June 2021 22:58:43 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > On Sunday 06 June 2021 23:16:03 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 05 June 2021 23:34:23 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > > On
On Tuesday 08 June 2021 20:47:42 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2021 22:58:43 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 June 2021 23:16:03 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > On Saturday 05 June 2021 23:34:23 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 05 June 2021 21:43:52 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
>
On Monday 07 June 2021 22:58:43 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Sunday 06 June 2021 23:16:03 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 June 2021 23:34:23 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > On Saturday 05 June 2021 21:43:52 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I'm testing 5.13.0-rc4 and nouveau crashes with NULL
On Sunday 06 June 2021 23:16:03 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Saturday 05 June 2021 23:34:23 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 June 2021 21:43:52 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm testing 5.13.0-rc4 and nouveau crashes with NULL pointer dereference
> > > in nouveau_bo_sync_for_device.
> > >
On Saturday 05 June 2021 23:34:23 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Saturday 05 June 2021 21:43:52 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm testing 5.13.0-rc4 and nouveau crashes with NULL pointer dereference in
> > nouveau_bo_sync_for_device.
> > Found various reports like this but that was back in
On Saturday 05 June 2021 21:43:52 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm testing 5.13.0-rc4 and nouveau crashes with NULL pointer dereference in
> nouveau_bo_sync_for_device.
> Found various reports like this but that was back in februaryso that should
> be fixed now.
So it is the same bug. Broken
Another instance of a report like this here:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/92
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 3:53 PM Ondrej Zary wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm testing 5.13.0-rc4 and nouveau crashes with NULL pointer dereference in
> nouveau_bo_sync_for_device.
> Found various reports
Hello,
I'm testing 5.13.0-rc4 and nouveau crashes with NULL pointer dereference in
nouveau_bo_sync_for_device.
Found various reports like this but that was back in februaryso that should be
fixed now.
[ 21.003216] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
[ 21.003235] #PF:
20 matches
Mail list logo
