I think that shoud be fine, which branch is it on?
On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 11:42 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 04:24:19PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Sorry! I've been pretty busy until now, this is:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
> >
> > Let me know if you've pushed it
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 04:24:19PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Sorry! I've been pretty busy until now, this is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
>
> Let me know if you've pushed it already or if you want me to push it to drm-
> misc
Either way is fine. I'm currently carrying it, but I can easily
Sorry! I've been pretty busy until now, this is:
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
Let me know if you've pushed it already or if you want me to push it to drm-
misc
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 12:15 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Ping. I'll take this via my tree unless someone else wants to take it...
>
> On Sun,
Ping. I'll take this via my tree unless someone else wants to take it...
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 10:30:41AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Both Coverity and GCC with -Wstringop-overflow noticed that
> nvif_outp_acquire_dp() accidentally defined its second argument with 1
> additional element:
>
>
