On 10/26/2015 03:54 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Although I would not have expected this to happen, we seem to run into
> race conditions if instobjs are accessed concurrently. Use a global lock
> for safety.
I wouldn't expect this to be an issue either.
Before merging such a large hammer of a
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On 10/26/2015 03:54 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Although I would not have expected this to happen, we seem to run into
>> race conditions if instobjs are accessed concurrently. Use a global lock
>> for safety.
> I wouldn't
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgk20a.c | 2 +-
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c | 8
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/nv40.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
In the meanwhile we're pushing out a change that just blanket allows
225MHz on Fermi and 297MHz on Kepler, with a kernel option override
available. At least one GF106 user claims to have working 297MHz with
proprietary drivers (and with nouveau in presence of the patches):
On 04.11.2015 11:57, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 02/11/15 08:28, poma wrote:
>> An interesting results.
>>
>> DRI2:
>>
>> $ vblank_mode=0 glxgears
>> ATTENTION: default value of option vblank_mode overridden by environment.
>> 6321 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1264.103 FPS
>> 6380 frames in 5.0 seconds =
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:38 AM, C Bergström wrote:
> To bring this conversation back on track - where would someone start
> *exactly* to port this to another OS? What kernel dependencies are
> there?
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/{nvkm,nvif,usif} can be dropped in wholesale
On 04/11/15 10:38, C Bergström wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Martin Peres wrote:
On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
Is anyone actually and or actively working on this?
Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable base.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
>
> Is anyone actually and or actively working on this?
> Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable base.
> Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70354
--- Comment #88 from Julien Isorce ---
(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #87)
> (In reply to Julien Isorce from comment #86)
> > I only tested with patch+workaround, but maybe "patch" is enough. I can try
> > to
On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
Is anyone actually and or actively working on this?
Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable
base. Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will be difficult to
overcome afaik.
As pointed out by Ilia, this is not
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92307
--- Comment #8 from poma ---
(In reply to poma from comment #7)
> FTR procedure:
>
> $ uname -r
> 4.3.0-0.rc6.git2.1.fc24.x86_64
>
> $ git clone git://people.freedesktop.org/~darktama/nouveau
> $ cd nouveau/drm/
> $
Wasn't there some work being done by François Tigeot or Jean-Sébastien Pédron
to port Nouveau to DragonFlyBSD/FreeBSD? Or at least they were talking about
porting it
at XDC 2014, no idea what the current status is.
Pierre
PS: Looking at François' slides from this year XDC, it seems there isn't
On 04/11/15 11:58, Pierre Moreau wrote:
Wasn't there some work being done by François Tigeot or Jean-Sébastien Pédron
to port Nouveau to DragonFlyBSD/FreeBSD? Or at least they were talking about
porting it
at XDC 2014, no idea what the current status is.
From what they said, they never really
On 02/11/15 08:28, poma wrote:
An interesting results.
DRI2:
$ vblank_mode=0 glxgears
ATTENTION: default value of option vblank_mode overridden by environment.
6321 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1264.103 FPS
6380 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1275.943 FPS
6369 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1273.629 FPS
6377
On 04.11.2015 11:56, Martin Peres wrote:
> From what they said, they never really cared about nvidia because nvidia
> provides a binary driver that works, unlike intel and amd.
They provide a binary driver for FreeBSD only. DragonFly and other BSDs
don't have that luxury.
--
Jean-Sébastien
On 04.11.2015 10:58, Pierre Moreau wrote:
> Wasn't there some work being done by François Tigeot or Jean-Sébastien Pédron
> to port Nouveau to DragonFlyBSD/FreeBSD? Or at least they were talking about
> porting it
> at XDC 2014, no idea what the current status is.
>
> Pierre
>
> PS: Looking at
16 matches
Mail list logo