Re: [Nouveau] [Discussion] User controls for PowerManagement

2010-01-10 Thread Pekka Paalanen
Adding dri-devel@ to CC. On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:44:24 +0100 r.spl...@umail.leidenuniv.nl wrote: With some progress in PowerManagement support (there's a patch nearly done for reading the P-tables, written mostly by xexaxo, derived from thunderbirds nvclock, with 0x40 adjustments from myself)

Re: [Nouveau] [Discussion] User controls for PowerManagement

2010-01-10 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:33:40PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: Adding dri-devel@ to CC. On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:44:24 +0100 r.spl...@umail.leidenuniv.nl wrote: With some progress in PowerManagement support (there's a patch nearly done for reading the P-tables, written mostly by xexaxo,

Re: [Nouveau] [Discussion] User controls for PowerManagement

2010-01-10 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:43:02 +0200 Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:44:24 +0100 r.spl...@umail.leidenuniv.nl wrote: 1. joi pointed out that procfs is deprecated, and I should use sysfs instead. /proc is not deprecated per se, you simply shouldn't

[Nouveau] [PATCH] nv04: Fix set_operation software method.

2010-01-10 Thread Marcin Kościelnicki
--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_graph.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_graph.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_graph.c index 98f3b40..e260986 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_graph.c +++

Re: [Nouveau] [TTM] general protection fault in ttm_tt_swapout, to_virtual looks screwed up

2010-01-10 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
I've seen something similar with openchrome, but I think I traced that down to the DMA engines causing memory corruption. Note that IIRC kmap_atomic may return page_address(page) for a lowmem page. Any idea what may cause kmap_atomic to behave in this way? /Thomas Maarten Maathuis wrote: I've

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH/TESTING(all hw)/DISCUSSION] FIFO (minor) create and (major) destroy instabilities on nv50+

2010-01-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 11:42:08PM +0100, okias wrote: Lastest patch work for me. NV96 NV92 works too. ___ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

Re: [Nouveau] [TTM] general protection fault in ttm_tt_swapout, to_virtual looks screwed up

2010-01-10 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Thomas Hellstrom tho...@shipmail.org wrote: I've seen something similar with openchrome, but I think I traced that down to the DMA engines causing memory corruption. Corruption outside the memory it was supposed to affect? Shouldn't that lead to massive

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] nouveau: Make winsys recognise the original NV50.

2010-01-10 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 05:15 +, Marcin Kościelnicki wrote: --- .../winsys/drm/nouveau/drm/nouveau_drm_api.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Pushed. diff --git a/src/gallium/winsys/drm/nouveau/drm/nouveau_drm_api.c