Hi,
On 28-07-15 09:26, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On 28 July 2015 at 01:52, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 24-07-15 04:32, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On 24 July 2015 at 01:20, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
MSI interrupts appear to not work for nv46 based cards. Change the mc
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Mario Kleiner
mario.kleiner...@gmail.com wrote:
Allow user to select the maximum level of DRI implementation
to use, DRI2 or DRI3.
exa accel supports both DRI2 and, if the kernel supports
rendernodes, also DRI3. However, DRI3 still seems to have
some bugs on
Allow user to select the maximum level of DRI implementation
to use, DRI2 or DRI3.
exa accel supports both DRI2 and, if the kernel supports
rendernodes, also DRI3. However, DRI3 still seems to have
some bugs on current implementations, and additionally it
doesn't work well at all for X-Servers
Allow user to select the maximum level of DRI implementation
to use, DRI2 or DRI3.
exa accel supports both DRI2 and, if the kernel supports
rendernodes, also DRI3. However, DRI3 still seems to have
some bugs on current implementations, and additionally it
doesn't work well at all for X-Servers
Make it a Bool consistently, as declared in header.
Reported-by: Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner mario.kleiner...@gmail.com
---
src/nouveau_present.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/nouveau_present.c
Series is Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu
I'll let it sit for a day or so in case others have feedback.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Mario Kleiner
mario.kleiner...@gmail.com wrote:
Allow user to select the maximum level of DRI implementation
to use, DRI2 or DRI3.
exa accel
