Indeed, it looks like the devel-clk branch does not have that typo.
On 2017-12-29 — 13:39, Rosen Penev wrote:
> This is fixed in a different nouveau branch. from Ben Skeggs last I remember.
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Pierre Moreau wrote:
> > The typo is still present in master.
> > Not sure whether it will help you Ben, regarding Fermi reclocking, but it
> > shouldn’t harm in reducing possible errors. :-)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pierre
> >
> > On 2017-07-27 — 18:20, Rosen Penev wrote:
> >> Signed-off by: Rosen Penev
> >> ---
> >> drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
> >> b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
> >> index 4a9bd4f1..feb8820c 100644
> >> --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
> >> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
> >> @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ gf100_ram_new_(const struct nvkm_ram_func *func,
> >> ram->fuc.r_0x10f9b4 = ramfuc_reg(0x10f9b4);
> >> ram->fuc.r_0x10fb04 = ramfuc_reg(0x10fb04);
> >> ram->fuc.r_0x10fb08 = ramfuc_reg(0x10fb08);
> >> - ram->fuc.r_0x137310 = ramfuc_reg(0x137300);
> >> + ram->fuc.r_0x137300 = ramfuc_reg(0x137300);
> >> ram->fuc.r_0x137310 = ramfuc_reg(0x137310);
> >> ram->fuc.r_0x137360 = ramfuc_reg(0x137360);
> >> ram->fuc.r_0x1373ec = ramfuc_reg(0x1373ec);
> >> --
> >> 2.13.3
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Nouveau mailing list
> >> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
> ___
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
