On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 22/11/17 03:42, Karol Herbst wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
>>> On 17/11/17 02:04, Karol Herbst wrote:
The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an
error.
Si
On 22/11/17 03:42, Karol Herbst wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
>> On 17/11/17 02:04, Karol Herbst wrote:
>>> The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an
>>> error.
>>>
>>> Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative val
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 17/11/17 02:04, Karol Herbst wrote:
>> The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an
>> error.
>>
>> Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative values. Those
>> negative values are not for erro
On 17/11/17 02:04, Karol Herbst wrote:
> The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an
> error.
>
> Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative values. Those
> negative values are not for error reporting, but rather when you buried
> your GPU in snow s
The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an
error.
Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative values. Those
negative values are not for error reporting, but rather when you buried
your GPU in snow somewhere in Antarctica and still want a valid
tempe