subject:"\[Nouveau\] \[PATCH 0\/9\] drm\/nouveau\: Cleanup event\/handler design"

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/9] drm/nouveau: Cleanup event/handler design

2013-08-29 Thread Peter Hurley

On 08/28/2013 03:15 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote: On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote: This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b 'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface',

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 0/9] drm/nouveau: Cleanup event/handler design

2013-08-28 Thread Ben Skeggs

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote: This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b 'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface', due to inverted lock order between

[Nouveau] [PATCH 0/9] drm/nouveau: Cleanup event/handler design

2013-08-27 Thread Peter Hurley

This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b 'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface', due to inverted lock order between nouveau_drm_vblank_enable() and nouveau_drm_vblank_handler() (the complete lockdep