On 26 May 2015 at 18:26, Pierre Moreau wrote:
>
>> On 26 May 2015, at 07:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Pierre Moreau wrote:
On 26 May 2015, at 00:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Pierre Moreau
> wrote:
> Most _DSM
> On 26 May 2015, at 07:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Pierre Moreau wrote:
>>> On 26 May 2015, at 00:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Pierre Moreau
wrote:
Most _DSM will return an integer value of 0x8002 when given
On 05/26/2015 12:22 AM, Pierre Moreau wrote:
Most _DSM will return an integer value of 0x8002 when given an unknown
UUID, revision ID or function ID. Checking locally allows us to differentiate
that case from other ACPI errors, and to not report a "failed to evaluate _DSM"
if 0x8002 is
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Pierre Moreau wrote:
>> On 26 May 2015, at 00:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Pierre Moreau
>>> wrote:
>>> Most _DSM will return an integer value of 0x8002 when given an unknown
>>> UUID, revision ID or function ID. Checking lo
> On 26 May 2015, at 00:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Pierre Moreau wrote:
>> Most _DSM will return an integer value of 0x8002 when given an unknown
>> UUID, revision ID or function ID. Checking locally allows us to differentiate
>> that case from other ACP
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Pierre Moreau wrote:
> Most _DSM will return an integer value of 0x8002 when given an unknown
> UUID, revision ID or function ID. Checking locally allows us to differentiate
> that case from other ACPI errors, and to not report a "failed to evaluate
> _DSM"
>
Most _DSM will return an integer value of 0x8002 when given an unknown
UUID, revision ID or function ID. Checking locally allows us to differentiate
that case from other ACPI errors, and to not report a "failed to evaluate _DSM"
if 0x8002 is returned which was confusing.
Signed-off-by: Pie
