On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:15:08PM +, Stuart Bennett wrote:
Stephane Marchesin wrote:
Hi,
As part of aiming at upstreaming our code, I suppose we have to
discuss the DRM situation a little. In order to aim for merging, I
think we'd better be working on a linux kernel tree layout.
mån 2009-03-09 klockan 22:49 +0100 skrev Stephane Marchesin:
Hi,
So, does that plan sound sane? Do you have better plans?
Stephane
I must say that for me it does not give that big problems, since I
already are using my own hem-brewed kernel. But I think it will be
harder getting testers if
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 23:23, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote:
Questions:
A tree based on what? (linus, drm-next, etc)
I would follow drm-next, but I don't think it is very relevant at this
point, since anyway drm-next periodically merges to linus. If there
are reasons to choose
Hi,
As part of aiming at upstreaming our code, I suppose we have to
discuss the DRM situation a little. In order to aim for merging, I
think we'd better be working on a linux kernel tree layout. And
considering we're technically the only ones still working in drm.git,
it doesn't really make sense
