Hi Wolfram,
On 4/5/2024 3:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hello Easwar,
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:24PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series
On 05/04/2024 12:18, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hello Easwar,
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:24PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix
Hi Easwar,
> Sorry, got excited. :) There were drivers I'd been part of that I specifically
> wanted to fixup, but then the scope grew to other users of algobit.
Well, you got some positive feedback, so that is good.
> > It is true that I changed quite some controller drivers within the i2c
> >
Hello Easwar,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:24PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of the
>
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of the
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
in the
