Re: [Nouveau] NVAC "No Signal"

2016-10-19 Thread Ben Skeggs
On 10/20/2016 03:58 AM, Pierre Moreau wrote: > Hello, > > On 07:37 pm - Oct 19 2016, poma wrote: >> On 19.10.2016 17:03, Karol Herbst wrote: >> >>> You don't get why I try to say. We have to actually find out when to >>> apply this workaround, not to create some silly whitelist/blacklist. >>>

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 5/5] recognize and accelerate GM20x

2016-10-19 Thread Martin Peres
On 18/10/16 12:19, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: This requires at least a quick test. :-) Acked-by: Samuel Pitoiset On 10/16/2016 09:14 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: Signed-off-by: Ilia

Re: [Nouveau] NVAC "No Signal"

2016-10-19 Thread Karol Herbst
2016-10-19 16:47 GMT+02:00 poma : > On 18.10.2016 16:02, Karol Herbst wrote: >> well, I just don't want that this fix breaks the same thing for other >> users, that's why I am asking. >> > > Affected device ID: >

Re: [Nouveau] NVAC "No Signal"

2016-10-19 Thread poma
On 18.10.2016 16:02, Karol Herbst wrote: > well, I just don't want that this fix breaks the same thing for other > users, that's why I am asking. > Affected device ID: https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau/blob/master/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/pci.c#L1229 can it be excluded from

Re: [Nouveau] NVAC "No Signal"

2016-10-19 Thread poma
On 19.10.2016 17:03, Karol Herbst wrote: > You don't get why I try to say. We have to actually find out when to > apply this workaround, not to create some silly whitelist/blacklist. > It's the last option, we never want to actually use. > Well if you do not say, who can understand!? :)

Re: [Nouveau] NVAC "No Signal"

2016-10-19 Thread Pierre Moreau
Hello, On 07:37 pm - Oct 19 2016, poma wrote: > On 19.10.2016 17:03, Karol Herbst wrote: > > > You don't get why I try to say. We have to actually find out when to > > apply this workaround, not to create some silly whitelist/blacklist. > > It's the last option, we never want to actually use. >