Re: [nox-dev] Bugs in the send_openflow_command(..) and send_openflow_packet(..)

2011-10-17 Thread andrea simeoni
Thank you very much Murphy :) 2011/10/17 Murphy McCauley > Yes. Use 0x as the second parameter to set_action_output(). > > -- Murphy > > On Oct 17, 2011, at 7:14 AM, andrea simeoni wrote: > > You are right Murphy, > > in the case of simplerouting, I receive error messages by all switches >

Re: [nox-dev] Bugs in the send_openflow_command(..) and send_openflow_packet(..)

2011-10-17 Thread Murphy McCauley
Yes. Use 0x as the second parameter to set_action_output(). -- Murphy On Oct 17, 2011, at 7:14 AM, andrea simeoni wrote: > You are right Murphy, > > in the case of simplerouting, I receive error messages by all switches along > the path except for the first (as it is the only having a non

Re: [nox-dev] Bugs in the send_openflow_command(..) and send_openflow_packet(..)

2011-10-17 Thread andrea simeoni
You are right Murphy, in the case of simplerouting, I receive error messages by all switches along the path except for the first (as it is the only having a non empty buffer-id for that packet). I didn't know that those OF errors could be ignored. I solved also the question for the send_openflow_

Re: [nox-dev] Bugs in the send_openflow_command(..) and send_openflow_packet(..)

2011-10-17 Thread Murphy McCauley
Assuming you're installing a route along multiple switches, all of them except maybe one should probably have an empty (0x) buffer_id. This doesn't seem like it should be the problem. I can't even hazard a guess without knowing more about the situation. What version of NOX are you runn

[nox-dev] Bugs in the send_openflow_command(..) and send_openflow_packet(..)

2011-10-17 Thread andrea simeoni
Hi guys, I'm trying to run the simplerouting component, and found that when installing the route it receives "Malformed packet error" messages back from the switches. The same happens when calling send_openflow_packet(..). If i go in wireshark to analyse the controller->switches openflow packets,