Do you don't need of s4:
SWITCHES=s1 s2 s3 s4 s5
s2_SLIRP=yes
*- s4_SLIRP=yes (remove)*
VMS=end1 openflow1 openflow2 end2
end1_NETS=s1
end2_NETS=s5
openflow1_NETS=s1 *s2* s3
openflow2_NETS=s3 *s2* s5
end1_KERNEL=kernel.bin
end2_KERNEL=kernel.bin
openflow1_KERNEL=kernel.bin
You are right, the switch sends back a OFPFMFC_ALL_TABLES_FULL error
message to the controller. The controller can either choose to delete
some of the flows, or it can just wait for some of the flows to
naturally expire before sending new flow_mods.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:16 PM,
I am trying to build the following topology in Nox:
Openflow2
-- -
End1 -- Openflow1
Openflow4 End2
-
Are you running 'discovery'? If so, the events you see could be the LLDP
packets sent by that component.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Rohit Manohar rdman...@ncsu.edu wrote:
I am trying to build the following topology in Nox:
Openflow2
I am simulating Load Distribution for Servers. I need to run the
distribution component only on the switch that is connected to the servers.
All other switches need to perform normal routing. Can I use different
controllers for different switches on the same network(by using a different
port
