RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-06 Thread R. Scott Perry
What I meant was in defining the test, what is the correct way to set up the exit code that Declude looks for? Something like this? NOXSPAM external positive "D:\imail\declude\noxmail.exe" 20 0 NOXSPAM external negative "D:\imail\declude\noxmail.exe" 40 0 No, we have not added a new "positive

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-06 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi John, I am going to have to defer to Scott on this one. I tried what I indicated below and could not make it work. So it is probable that I misunderstood the syntax. Brian On 01/06/03 7:58am you wrote... >> Here is the text from the message I posted regarding this: > > > >What I meant was i

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-06 Thread John Tolmachoff
> Here is the text from the message I posted regarding this: What I meant was in defining the test, what is the correct way to set up the exit code that Declude looks for? Something like this? NOXSPAM external positive "D:\imail\declude\noxmail.exe" 20 0 NOXSPAM external negative "D:\imail\dec

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-06 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi John, Here is the text from the message I posted regarding this: ** I enabled the positive/negative testing for Declude. http://www.noxmail.com/imail/noxbeta.zip This must use http://www.declude.com/release/165i/declude.exe (interim release) or newer. To use the No-X-Mail test this wa

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-06 Thread John Tolmachoff
Brain or Scott, what is the syntax for the return code for this? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:NoX-List- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian M

RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

2003-01-06 Thread R. Scott Perry
Actually, a couple of interim versions back, and I think in the last official update, he suppressed the message if the "D" file was deleted. Maybe he also did that for the real "Q" file, but we delete the "_" temporary file which is what the "Q" file is renamed to when the message is in process.

Re: [NoXMail] +/- test question

2003-01-06 Thread Brian Milburn
The score return is always the greater failure. If spam has a higher score then it will be called spam. The same for adult. On 01/06/03 7:24am you wrote... >If a message fails BOTH spam and adult, which score is returned? > >My short-term suggestion is to have adult override spam (i.e., return t

[NoXMail] +/- test question

2003-01-06 Thread Bill Naber
If a message fails BOTH spam and adult, which score is returned? My short-term suggestion is to have adult override spam (i.e., return the negative exit code whenever the adult test fails). My longer term suggestion is to allow a command line parameter that would tell NoXMail to only check for sp