RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

Actually, a couple of interim versions back, and I think in the last official update, he suppressed the message if the "D" file was deleted. Maybe he also did that for the real "Q" file, but we delete the "_" temporary file which is what the "Q" file is renamed to when the message is in process.

RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

Actually, a couple of interim versions back, and I think in the last official update, he suppressed the message if the "D" file was deleted. Maybe he also did that for the real "Q" file, but we delete the "_" temporary file which is what the "Q" file is renamed to when the message is in process.

RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

> The Declude file errors are due to No-X-Mail deleting the in-process, > temporary "Q" file when the message is held. I probably need to clue Scott > into the fact we are doing this so he can suppress the error if necessary. It > should not do any harm other than add a line to the Declude log file

Re: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

lmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 4:43 PM >Subject: RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054 > > >I would take those down right now. > >You can zip and send to Brian or if you want

RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

Thanks John, you are correct of course. While the distribution of this list is very limited, the archives are there for anyone to see. On 01/04/03 2:39pm you wrote... >Done. > >1. Never put stuff like that out to the public. >2. Remember, this is a weekend, and people are only on if and when th

RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

Done. 1. Never put stuff like that out to the public. 2. Remember, this is a weekend, and people are only on if and when they can be. The only reason I am on right now is because I am babysitting a merger in which data has to be transferred and I have to be available to trouble shoot. John Tolm

Re: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

, 2003 4:43 PM Subject: RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054 I would take those down right now. You can zip and send to Brian or if you want I will do it for you, as I have saved those locally. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft,

RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:NoX-List- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054 > > A very large number of my log lines have

Re: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

: "Brian Milburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 3:05 PM Subject: Re: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054 > > Hi Greg, > > Does this happen very often? It is a "handled" error conditio

Re: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

Hi Greg, Does this happen very often? It is a "handled" error condition and not critical, but I am curious how often you see it and under what circumstances it may occur. I have never actually seen this error before, although I have designed the program to recognize and report that it may occur.

RE: [NoXMail] error #2 & Access violation at address 75740054

What did you have delete the e-mail, Declude or NoXMail? The Error #2 I think indicates that something else deleted or moved the file. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL