Hi All,
We regret to inform you that we will not be pushing through with the
1.3-incubating release.
There were quite a number of issues raised on that release particularly
regarding the LICENSES.
Also the deployed artifacts were not synched to central.
Are there any objections if we proceed
On 17/03/2011, at 10:45 PM, Lars Corneliussen wrote:
is OK for me. Just that i have to revert that blogpost.
Could you sum up, for somebody not familiar with apache processes, why we had
to withdraw this release? And how beeing in incubation makes it different?
I would then blog about
The two remaining mentors to vote (to make up sufficient IPMC votes)
On 27/02/2011, at 9:05 PM, Lars Corneliussen wrote:
Hi all,
what is missing for a release?
- Lars
--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
snapshot file
already exists locally.) for the 1.3-incubating release.
Will also start looking into the licenses.
We still haven't decided on what repository will use for the
deployment, so we'll just follow up on the thread that was sent
earlier.
Thanks,
--
liit
- Brett
Also, maybe we can consider https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-356
as it has a patch
On 07/01/2011, at 3:47 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I think we need to arrange a couple of things:
- license RAT check
- initial IP clearance
- which repository is going to be used to deploy to
Hi All,
We are planning to release NPanday-1.3-incubating within this month.
The issues included for this release are as follows:
NPANDAY-69 NPanday needs to be more synchronized and automated
NPANDAY-186 Remove the uac and pab directories
NPANDAY-239 VS Add-in messes up settings.xml
