+1 on moving and +1 on the documentation.
Thanks,
--
liit
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote:
> I'm ok with moving to maven3 as long as the transition is well documented.
>
I'm ok with moving to maven3 as long as the transition is well documented.
What do the others think? Vote necessary?
Am 28.03.11 16:51, schrieb Brett Porter:
Definitely helpful in trying to ship a self-contained release.
On 28/03/2011, at 5:30 PM, Lars Corneliussen wrote:
Hi,
I really find it an obstacle to build NPanday trunk itself with an old NPanday
version. I
Definitely helpful in trying to ship a self-contained release.
On 28/03/2011, at 5:30 PM, Lars Corneliussen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really find it an obstacle to build NPanday trunk itself with an old
> NPanday version. It feels like stone age :) But sadly, due to a bug in MVN
> 2.2.1, it is not po
Hi,
I really find it an obstacle to build NPanday trunk itself with an old
NPanday version. It feels like stone age :) But sadly, due to a bug in
MVN 2.2.1, it is not possible to use plugin-versions that just built
within the same reactor.
So i suggest to move on to Maven 3.0.x for building
