[ns] Wimax implementation in ns2

2013-05-12 Thread nishil dahin
Hi guys, I wanted to know which all are the main files related to wimax implementation in ns2. Like for wifi - ieee 802.11, it is mac-802_11.cc, .h and mac-timers.cc, .h; correspondingly, which files are for 802.16 (wimax) ? Nihad S.

[ns] Problems attaching new agent to a node

2013-05-12 Thread Mohsen Sasaninasab
Hello everybody, I implemented a new agent Clustering in application layer. I put my .cc, .h, and .tcl files in my own directory (mohsen) under the ns directory. Then I added the new packet type in 'packet.h' under packet_t{} and p_info {}. Also I did necessary changes in ns-default.tcl,

[ns] GPSR implementation running out of memory

2013-05-12 Thread Anas Almajali
All, I ported GPSR implementation to ns-2 2.34. The examples that come with the implementation work fine. Some of my simulations that have small number of nodes or few events happening work fine too. However, when I increase the number of nodes above 100 nodes and have more events, the

Re: [ns] GPSR implementation running out of memory

2013-05-12 Thread Saravanan Kandasamy
Anas, You are facing a memory leak. The effect of memory leak aggravated when you run longer simulation time, simulating larger number of nodes or both. Valgrind is good for memory leak detection. It able to show the functions and exact lines of codes that potentially causing some of the memory

[ns] Extended Deadline: IEEE HEALTHCOM 2013, Lisbon, Portugal October 09-12, 2013

2013-05-12 Thread Jaime Lloret Mauri
CALL FOR PAPERS 15th IEEE International Conference on e-Health Networking, Application Services (IEEE HEALTHCOM 2013) Lisbon, Portugal – October 09-12, 2013 http://www.ieee-healthcom.org IEEE Healthcom 2013 is fully sponsored by the IEEE Communications Society. It aims at bringing together

[ns] selfish node isolation

2013-05-12 Thread Ramaprabha N
Hi All I have implemented the selfish node creation in aodv.cc . Can any body tell me how to isolate a malicious/ selfish nodes in aodv.cc function??? and it should be reflected in the printed route table. i mean the route table should avoid the particular malicious nodes... thanks