Hi
In mac802.11 one of the state the system can enter is idle state. We have a
three variable rx_state_ , tx_state and nav_. Can anybody tell how can we
calculate the the idle time before the station enters either in transmit or
receive mode.
Neeraj
Neeraj Gupta
Fine, I suggest two method we can follow
1- All reply for all.
2- All relpy in perivate and then the person who was asking the question,
gather the replys and forward them as an answer of that question (we will
only have one collected reply).
//may be use a tag in the subject of the reply mail
Hello,
I'm trying to monitor queue size in wireless scenario.
I've read this topic:
http://old.nabble.com/how-to-monitor-the-queue-on-a-wireless-node-to30608840.html
how-to-monitor-the-queue-on-a-wireless-node
And do the things explained in:
http://hpds.ee.ncku.edu.tw/~smallko/ns2/qa_en.htm
the latter one is much better,
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
To: Ahmad arasem...@yahoo.com, ns-users@ISI.EDU
Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 4:38 AM
Fine, I
hi
how the queue length of each node was calculated in wireless network?
how will alter the queue length ?
regards
akalya
Hi, I got the same error while recompiling (when enter 'make')ns2.34 on
ubuntu 9.10. Did you figure out this error?? If yes, kindly share your
experience.
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/instaling-ns2-in-redhat-linux-tp30870975p30977959.html
Sent from the
On 21 Φεβ 2011, at 3:32 μ.μ., gzkhan wrote:
Hi, I got the same error while recompiling (when enter 'make')ns2.34 on
ubuntu 9.10. Did you figure out this error?? If yes, kindly share your
experience.
Thank you.
You can try:
make clean in ns 2.34 directory
and ./install in ns-allinone
Hi,
The problem with the latter one (i.e., when a questioner gets the answer,
repost the answer back to the mailing list) is that the person who's got the
answer may not forward the answer back to the mailing list. Even when you have
the rule written say in FAQ, new persons who recently
Hi all,
I agree with Teerawat, the replay to all with special tag is more
efficient , However we can define special tag for different questions :
For example I have noted that most of the question is related to the
problem of installation : ns2.29 on ubuntu , on fedora , bad version of
Hi Hadi,
Thanks for the support. I understand that you'd like to make tag more specific
to fit the readers' need. However, there is a wide variety of question in this
mailing list. For example,
- Installation basic NS2
- Installation of patch (which some people don't even know that they are
Have someone answered this to you?
Érico V. Porto
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:41 PM, lim shia yok shia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Most of us are lacking the code information about clustering based routing
protocol, pls help, thanks
I need your help on how do I collect the weight for cluster
I was looking at the mac802_11.cc implementation, and looking at the
following function:
Mac802_11::recv
It seems that it also has another type of decision clause:
if(pktRx_-txinfo_.RxPr / p-txinfo_.RxPr = p-txinfo_.CPThresh) {
capture(p);
} else {
collision(p);
}
From this code I think a
In this case is easier if you just make a tcl function that do that to you.
something like (don't know if the syntax is right)
proc calcDist { node_a node_b } {
set x1 [$node_a set X_]
set y1 [$node_a set Y_]
set x2 [$node_b set X_]
set y2 [$node_b set Y_]
set distance [expr
Hi all
I have, for example, a tree topology composed of 9 nodes. Imagine that node 4
is
connected to nodes 1, 2, 3, and 5 and I want to send a broadcast packet to
nodes
2, 3 and 5 but no to node 1. How can I do that in C++? I want nodes 2, 3 and 5
receives the packet at same time (it
Hi
the problem is that I have collisions. Imagine the same example (multihop
network), node 4 and node 7 are directly connected to 1 (1 is their parent) and
they do the same at the same time, broadcast/multicast a packet to their
childrens (4 to 2, 3 and 5; 7 to 8 and 9). In a normal
Hi Stephan
you are right but that is not really the point. As you say, If I want to do
what
I explain, with a broadcast I can't control where the packets go, but I need to
do exactly that. I need all children nodes receive at same time a packet from
their parent. In a single PAN tree
I agree, I think we should go with the first option otherwise I can tell you
that it will be not likelky a person will sit down to collect all the answer
and
send it to the group.. lets face it, laziness plays a factor here. However when
a person is answering the question, it is very simple
17 matches
Mail list logo
