Re: [ns] [Ns-developers] transmission range in wifi network

2009-04-09 Thread Mathieu Lacage
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:59 +0200, ichrak amdouni wrote: I doubt that is the case with the default values of all parameters. Maybe you changed some parameters ? Yes, it is the case, the mac association succeed between an access point and one

[ns] ns-3-users google group

2008-06-01 Thread Mathieu Lacage
hi, A couple of weeks ago, we discussed the possibility of creating a mailing-list for ns-3 users to avoid the large traffic on the ns-users mailing-list. The group is now located there for web-based browsing and for subscription: http://groups.google.com/group/ns-3-users The email address to

[ns] [NSTools'07] Deadline extended to June 1, 2007

2007-04-28 Thread Mathieu Lacage
** NSTools'07 is in technical cooperation with ACM SIGMETRICS and SIGSIM All accepted papers will be made available in ACM Digital Library, as well as indexed by EI and ISI Index. ** WORKSHOP CO-CHAIRS ** Claudio Cicconetti, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Univ. of Pisa, Italy Mathieu Lacage, [EMAIL PROTECTED

[ns] [NSTools'07] Call for Papers

2007-04-01 Thread mathieu lacage
://cocus.info/). ** PUBLICATION ** All submitted papers will go through a peer review process. All accepted papers will be made available in Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library. ** WORKSHOP CO-CHAIRS ** Claudio Cicconetti, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Univ. of Pisa, Italy Mathieu Lacage

Re: [ns] new 802.11 - CAP proportion too big

2006-09-06 Thread Mathieu Lacage
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 01:02 +0100, Pedro Fortuna wrote: if ((*tmp).second + m_parameters-getMSDULifetime () now) { It's delay bounded, and its limited with the value returned by function getMSDULifetime, which by default is 10 seconds, which is a very large value for delay. Do you have a

Re: [ns] new 802.11 - CAP proportion too big

2006-08-15 Thread mathieu lacage
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 23:54 +0100, Pedro Fortuna wrote: I'll do my best trying to find the problem. I'll submit a patch if I succeed correcting it (assuming there's a problem). There is a question on the DCF implementation part I'd like to ask if you don't mind. It seems that there's no