Re: [ns] NS manual to wiki

Lachlan Andrew wrote: > Greetings Tom, > > It seems you're right that the main problem with maintaining the manual > is apathy rather than access, judging by the deafening silence in > response from your request for responses. > > In that case, how can I get access to the manual to fix some of

Re: [ns] NS manual to wiki

checked for accuracy by the veterans before inclusion, and also annotation such as requests for clarification and draft documentation of new features. Thanks, Lachlan ns-users-requ...@isi.edu wrote: > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:52:21 -0800 > From: Tom Henderson >

Re: [ns] NS manual to wiki

for ns-3? Thanks, Joarder Mohammad Mustafa Kamal --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Tom Henderson wrote: From: Tom Henderson Subject: Re: [ns] NS manual to wiki To: "Lachlan Andrew" Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 2:52 AM Lachlan Andrew wrote: > Greetings all, >

Re: [ns] NS manual to wiki

Lachlan Andrew wrote: > Greetings all, > > The NS manual seems rather out of date. (There are comments from 2001 > about "changes in the near future", and snippets of code that have > changed radically, and references to files that no longer exist.) > > I have started copying the contents from

[ns] NS manual to wiki

Greetings all, The NS manual seems rather out of date. (There are comments from 2001 about "changes in the near future", and snippets of code that have changed radically, and references to files that no longer exist.) I have started copying the contents from the PDF to the wiki, at