[ns] [Very Urgent] Error of PUMA multicasting in multiple radio multiple channel network

2011-04-25 Thread Ejaz Ahmed Awan
Dear All, I am facing problem in simulating the PUMA in multiple radio multi channel environment. I have ported PUMA multicasting patch for wireless to ns-2.31. Its working well when i ran its example. I have also integrated the crcn patch for cognitive radio network in ns-2.31 which is also

Re: [ns] [Very Urgent] Error of PUMA multicasting in multiple radio multiple channel network

2011-04-25 Thread Mubashir Rehmani
Hi Ejaz, In fact, the CRCN patch has an array that maintains the number of channels at the routing layer. When you run any other routing protocol except the aodv or wcett provided with the CRCN patch, it will give you an error. Because, other protocols are not configured to work with multiple

[ns] unable to create mobility file

2011-04-25 Thread narendra k
hi all, i am getting following errors, plz some buddy help me to solve this [root@localhost example]# ns box.tcl setting initial variables... setting other default settings... removing unecessary packet headers... num_nodes is set 50 creating channel... setting global node values...

[ns] problem with arp

2011-04-25 Thread parisa abedy
Hi all, I want to simulate a WSN. I have created a network with 100 nodes. the problem is that I have so many dropped arp packet in trace file. so nodes can not connect to base station and send their data. I think about an initialization time for arp. but I don't know how I should this. Does

[ns] TDMA for MANETS and a packet scheduler

2011-04-25 Thread Velizar Dimitrov
Hello, everyone! I'm want to ask if anyone is aware if there is a TDMA implementation for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with tunable parameters and maybe a packet scheduler for ns-2? If anyone has any code available, please let me know! Regards, Velizar Dimitrov

[ns] DAD procedure in Mobile IPv6

2011-04-25 Thread tran hung
Hi friends, Please help me solve this problem : Ipv6 address has 128 bits include 64 bits subnet prefix and 64 bits interface ID. I known that 64 bits interface ID is unique, right ? So, why check DAD (Duplicate Address Detection) for 64 bits interface ID while it is unique ? Thank you ! Best