Hullo mate,
When the error on the link is small, you will not notice a difference.
Snoop just like any other link layer solution was designed to enhance TCP
performance in wireless or random error environments.
In a lossless environment, the setup with or without snoop will yield very
similar,
Hullo Shiny,
Apologies for failing to get back to you in time, I've been so caught up.
Please find attached two examples running snoop.
In example snoopns2.tcl, the slight difference in configuration for snoop
is explained in a comment.
Please pay attention to the source path at the beginning
Hullo Shiny,
I also forgot to mention that how you can tell there's a difference is by
running one protocol end to end (for example Reno), and then running the
same setup but with snoop at an intermediate node. Then monitor some
statistics like throughput at the sink. One of the examples I sent
